3×3 basketball is being hailed as a new Olympic sport, but its shortcomings are glaring. The level of play does not hold a candle to traditional basketball, and the USA’s performance raises serious questions.
– The USA failed to dominate 3×3 basketball, winning only a bronze medal with questions about future growth and development lingering.
– Critics argue that it lacks the strategy and artistry of traditional 5×5 basketball, resulting in a game filled with fouls and rushed shots.
– Despite attempts to boost interest, including professional leagues and youth camps, many believe this format is inferior and harms the perception of basketball as a whole.
– The game’s chaotic nature and a short 10-minute runtime dilute its competitive spirit.
– The need for 3×3 basketball at the Olympics is debated, especially since it doesn’t attract top-tier talent, making it feel like a lesser version of real basketball.
Overall, while some support the growth of 3×3, it faces skepticism from those who cherish the complexity and skill of traditional basketball.
